Work Package 3

Work Package 3: Better involving end-users

This third WP aims to build and evaluate warning systems meeting real operational needs, by involving the new methods developed in WP1 and WP2. End-users will be associated at each step of the elaboration of these new flood warning approaches, from defining the specifications of the systems to evaluating their performances. The MUFFINS consortium indeed involves varied end-users such as Min. of ecological transition/SCHAPI, Météo France/SPC MedEst, and Caisse Centrale de Réassurance (CCR), all currently operating operational real time (or short delayed-time) warning and/or monitoring systems.

Considering this panel of actors, the exchanges will be focused on three different application scales:

  • the national scale corresponding to the Vigicrues and Vigicrues flash systems operated by the SCHAPI, and the insurance losses modeling chain operated by the CCR.
  • the regional scale corresponding to the forecasting chains developed by the local forecasting services such as SPC MedEst.
  • the local scale corresponding to warning systems developed by local authorities. The corresponding actors will be invited to contribute to the reflection.

The currently existing operational warning systems, their current performances and limitations, and the wishes for evolutions and improvements expressed by the end users will be at the core of the reflection to shape the new modeling chains to be applied and tested on the considered case studies. This WP is organized in 3 main tasks, described hereafter.

Task 3.1: Analysis of currently existing warning tools and needs for improvements

This task aims to address the following questions:

  • What are the main forecasting/warning issues raised by the case-studies?

 

  • How do the current operational system perform and which improvements should be achieved?

Partners involved: All partners

Task 3.2: Definition of the structure of the new warning systems to be experimented

 

  • How should the different data sources and modeling components be combined to provide significant advances?

 

  • Which procedures and metrics should be used for a relevant evaluation of the proposed forecasting chains?

 

Partners involved: All partners

Task 3.3: Application and evaluation of the proposed warning systems

Partners involved: All partners